[worldKit-dev] Controlling annotation visibility based on zoomlevel

Mikel Maron mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 16 12:46:56 PDT 2006


Jim

That's excellent. I've wanted to get worldKit compiled with MTASC, and integrated with the whole osflash toolset. There's nothing stopping this from going forward, someone just needs to put it together, and I haven't had a chance to get dirty with it.

Mikel



----- Original Message ----
From: Jim Baack <jhb01 at thebaacks.com>
To: Discussion of worldKit use and development <worldkit-dev at lists.brainoff.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:07:29 PM
Subject: Re: [worldKit-dev] Controlling annotation visibility based on zoomlevel

Thanks, Mikel.

The first approach would probably be a good start for me. I may have some time in the next couple weeks to work on this.

As a first step, I'd like to get setup to build the source. Is MTASC an option?

Jim

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:03:16 -0700 (PDT), Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Jim
> 
> Welcome :)
> 
> There are two approaches to these problems generally .. first by manually
> specifying which annotations are visible at which zoom level, and second
> by automatically 'clustering' annotations to reduce clutter at lower zoom.
> 
> The first is easy, the second hard, and both would be great to have
> implemented in worldKit .. which can't handle either yet.
> 
> Specifying the annotation zoom level visibility would be a straightforward
> thing to implement. Though I am lacking time at the moment. This would be
> an ideal contribution.
> I can guide you, or another developer, in how to implement this.
> 
> Mikel
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jim Baack <jhb01 at thebaacks.com>
> To: worldkit-dev at lists.brainoff.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:35:35 PM
> Subject: [worldKit-dev] Controlling annotation visibility based on zoom
> level
> 
> I'm new to worldkit so my apologies if there's a documented answer to this
> question - I didn't find one.
> 
> I'm wondering about how to control the visibility of anotations based on
> how far in/out the map is zoomed. The scenario is something like this - a
> Zoomified map of California with heavy annotations at the city level.
> Viewing the whole state, the annotations would be an ugly mess all on top
> of each other in each city. They would then separate and become useful as
> one zooms in. Is there a way to turn off the annotations at the outer zoom
> - or better, indicate that there are multiple annotations but not try to
> display every one? Thanks.
> 
> Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> worldkit-dev mailing list
> worldkit-dev at lists.brainoff.com
> http://lists.brainoff.com/listinfo.cgi/worldkit-dev-brainoff.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> worldkit-dev mailing list
> worldkit-dev at lists.brainoff.com
> http://lists.brainoff.com/listinfo.cgi/worldkit-dev-brainoff.com

_______________________________________________
worldkit-dev mailing list
worldkit-dev at lists.brainoff.com
http://lists.brainoff.com/listinfo.cgi/worldkit-dev-brainoff.com






More information about the worldkit-dev mailing list